▲ | msp26 4 days ago | |||||||
I haven't bothered with video gen because I'm too impatient but isn't Wan pretty good too on regular hardware? | ||||||||
▲ | dragonwriter 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Wan 2.1 (and Hunyuan and LTXV, in descending ordee of overall video quality but each has unique strengths) work well—but slow, except LTXV—for short (single digit seconds at their usual frame rates — 16 for WAN, 24 for LXTV, I forget for Hunyuan) videos on consumer hardware. But this blows them entirely out of the water on the length it can handle, so if it does so with coherence and quality across general prompts (especially if it is competitive with WAN and Hunyuan on trainability for concepts it may not handle normally) it is potentially a radical game changer. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | dewarrn1 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
LTX-Video isn't quite the same quality as Wan, but the new distilled 0.9.6 version is pretty good and screamingly fast. | ||||||||
▲ | vunderba 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Wan 2.1 is solid but you start to get pretty bad continuity / drift issues when genning more than 81 frames (approx 5 seconds of video) whereas FramePack lets you generate 1+ minute. |