▲ | bell-cot 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's been a while since I crawled Wikipedia's rabbit hole on this - but I recall there being regions of the stellar "mass vs. metallicity" graph in which direct collapse to a black hole is the expected outcome. Is there an astrophysicist in the house? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | magicalhippo 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seems this is the case for both supermassive black hole formation[1][2], and stellar direct-collapse black holes due to failed supernova[3]. But yeah, just a layman so hopefully someone knowledgeable chimes in. [1]: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | metalman 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
not an astro anything, but the easy question is how does the sun switch off it's light output so suddenly as to cause a perfect garavitational collapse presumably it has to be a large metal rich star and exist without too much local gas or a companion star one thing is clear at this point is that the variety of stelar and galactic variability is much larger than what was predicted even a few decades ago, though the idea of a star just neatly removing itself from this universe when it's done, is very strange indeed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|