| ▲ | halosghost 20 hours ago |
| As opposed to overly-engineered websites that hijack [0] scroll-behavior, which only increase anxiety and fury. ಠ_ಠ All the best, -HG [0]: web-designers take-note, the normal term [1] in the field for doing this refers to violent crime. Think on your sins. [1]: https://robinrendle.com/notes/scrolljacking/ |
|
| ▲ | dan-g 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| From the HN guidelines[0]: > Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html |
| |
| ▲ | halosghost 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | While I fully understand, and try hard to refrain from making such comments, given that the actual point of this article is about stress-relief, but it leverages design patterns which are genuinely awful for accessibility and positive, consistent experiences on the web, it does actually feel topical to me. Put another way, I do not believe this is about a “tangential” annoyance. All the best, -HG | | |
| ▲ | kbelder 18 hours ago | parent [-] | | Right. It's front and center; kind of the most obvious talking point about the article. It arguably generates a much stronger visceral reaction than the actual contents. That's why it's such a bad pattern. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Loughla 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| All the rest of your nonsense aside, why did you sign your comment. You know your name is already attached to that, right? |
| |
