▲ | 9dev 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> what if there is no political party "representing" me If it bothers you enough, you’re supposed to create your own party. Democracy doesn’t mean that everyone else is doing the hard work for you. > what about people abstaining from voting Silent disagreement—if they were bothered enough, they would go voting. > what if peoples elect an authoritarian figure I didn't vote for If a few people do this, the system can (and has, for hundreds of years) handle it just fine. If more and more people do it, something is off, and nobody did anything about it. Part of the problem is people stopped caring and participating, expecting someone else to. > if only one citizen disagree, or do not feel represented in it, this justification falls apart. It’s no justification. We live in a shared society, democracy is a compromise to make the most people in it happy. > the state is not putting me in prison for my dissident opinion, I went to prison myself. As far as I can see, no democratic state is putting you in prison for a dissenting opinion, as long as you don’t endanger someone else with it. Otherwise, yes: if you willingly went against the rules you agreed to follow by actively enjoying the benefits of a free, democratic society, then it’s reasonable to go to prison if you’re caught. You expect the same of other criminals, even if they may not realise the error of their ways yet. People take everything around them for granted, acting like their freedom doesn’t come at a cost. It does. By living in a democracy, you enjoy boundless riches, housing, health care, fair trials, roads, plumbing, electricity, supermarkets, and a myriad of scale effects that are only possible because a lot of people have agreed to work together. The price to thrive in that system is to adhere to our collective rules, and deal with the fact that we constantly need to make compromises with our neighbours so the majority of people can be as happy as possible. And yes, that means even a government that you don’t fully agree with represents you, if not perfectly; it means taking responsibility for the mechanism that feeds you. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | bccdee 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> If it bothers you enough, you’re supposed to create your own party. Yeah, and that party wouldn't get any seats. I'm sorry, how did we go from "the state IS the population" to "well if your policy preferences fall outside the two agendas on offer, you have to start an electorally-successful third party—something NOBODY has managed to do—and if you don't or if it doesn't work, then it's your fault." It sounds like you're trying to apportion blame for why the state ISN'T the population, and at that point, you've already conceded that your initial claim was wrong. | |||||||||||||||||
|