▲ | hinkley 5 days ago | |
I suspect the confusion of priorities comes from running native code that’s time consuming and wanting it to horizontally scale with your cluster, which is easier if you try to let the beam do it. While what is easier for those of us not working on the beam is to put the glitchy code into its own service and put up with the maintenance overhead. But when you have one or two solutions the friction to move to three becomes difficult. People start talking about how having dozens will be chaos. While true, sometimes you really do just need three and it’s not a slippery slope. | ||
▲ | toast0 4 days ago | parent [-] | |
> sometimes you really do just need three If it's worth doing, it's worth doing three times. |