| ▲ | alpaca128 2 days ago | |
> It seems some models ignore it and produce mostly clean images on the output (looking like the last image), while others just interpret is as a texture This sounds like you’re talking about img2img generation based on a glazed image instead of training, which isn’t the intended purpose. | ||
| ▲ | dale_glass a day ago | parent [-] | |
No, I'm not talking about img2img. There are people training LoRAs on these. There's been multiple experiments, so far I've seen no evidence of it working as intended. Here's an example I found: https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/1h1x4e2/a_very_deta... You can see there an example of training picking up the glaze artifacts and just using them as a funky texture. That's not really what Glaze is intended to do. Glaze is supposed to interfere with training, not be interpreted as "this artist draws skin with a weird pattern on it". | ||