▲ | alganet 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HN proceeds to give a crowd pseudo-lecture on notation, because notation is important. I think HN misses the point. If you do these analysis using very basic notation knowledge (letters on top of lyrics are chords!), can you discover by yourself what you missed? Many self-taught amateur musicians go through something similar. You play the simple chord chart, then you notice by yourself that it is not enough. You start to understand the instrument, training the ear, and learning beyond the simple charts. Can you do that with data? Possibly. Maybe, as others mentioned, another dataset would be needed. However, to suggest that such dataset needs to be "a better one in notation" seems misguided. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | duped 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't see anyone harping on notation, but using notation to point out why the analysis is lacking. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|