▲ | anenefan a day ago | |||||||
Quite interesting, to myself magnetic fields wouldn't seem all that accurate but then again it's known some animals can navigate back to the same spot each yearly nesting / migration. It did seem maybe as per the article and [1] [2] the concept was just a little bit too good to be true but [3] being military supports that they've been working towards an additional perhaps more accurate system. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08167 [Submitted on 10 Apr 2025 - Quantum-assured magnetic navigation achieves positioning accuracy better than a strategic-grade INS in airborne and ground-based field trials] [2] https://q-ctrl.com/blog/q-ctrl-overcomes-gps-denial-with-qua... [the company's blog] [3] https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2024-09-25/battl... [25 September 2024 Battlefield developments in their sights] | ||||||||
▲ | Someone a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> Quite interesting, to myself magnetic fields wouldn't seem all that accurate but then again it's known some animals can navigate back to the same spot each yearly nesting / migration I think consensus (insofar it exists; the field is rather divided on how these animals navigate) is that these animals use a combination of signals. In particular, they may use magnetic fields ‘only’ for getting roughly home, then use smell and/or vision for precise navigation. Also, those animals only statistically make it back to the same spot with fairly high losses. | ||||||||
|