▲ | mrbigbob 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
I am getting sick and tired of the thinly veiled excuse of "we need to strip away more of your privacy in order to protect the childen" we all know they are doing it because they want to surveil/track you more easily. and for those that think they are actually doing this to protect the children and you are concerned about what your children sees online this might sound a bit harsh but why dont you actually parent. Stop giving your kids unlimited access you tablets/computers etc. back in my day there was the option of having a single computer for the child in a public room that could not be moved. you could create whitelist only sites nowadays very easily even for laymens. i understand it is a bit harder nowdays because more parents are both working to support the family but i rather not loose what little privacy we have left as a society because its requires more work for you to parent | ||||||||||||||
▲ | intrasight 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I've made this suggestion in past discussions on this topic. Users should be anonymous. Sites should verify that user is over 18 using a government web service. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | jasonlotito 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
The fact that you think that anything you suggested would prevent or hinder a child from seeing things you don't want them to see online, or that it would affect a child's ability to be affected by what is online is indicative of the bigger problem. To put it into terms you might understand, you are storing your passwords in plaintext and the traffic isn't encrypted. Basically, you're ignorant. This isn't to say that the laws that the majority put into place are good. I'm not speaking on that. You are, in this situation, that layman, who cannot solve the problem you are claiming you want to solve. | ||||||||||||||
|