▲ | layman51 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
GeoGuessr is also not a “solved problem” in the sense that if you give the model a photo of an outdoor location that is not covered by Google Street View, then it will just make an educated guess which might still be many kilometers away. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | pelagicAustral 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm not ashamed to say that for about 6 months I played Geogessr thinking that you could not move around, but only look around... and I did pretty good in my mind. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | defrost 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Much of the interior of Western Australia (an area 3x the size of Texas) can be divided into very few cells which essentially look near identical in all directions, coupled with few roads for the area and not much in the way of uploaded snaps coverage. There's a lot of flat lands with spinifex in certain areas (easily a couple of United Kingdoms in size) and even a touch of mesa won't help narrow a location down from the general are as there are many of those with identical edge profiles. But sure "Pilbara", "Kimberley", "Wheatbelt" can be geo guessed .. it's a real challenge to narrow down (I spent some time doing wet film photogrammetry prior to sheperding in WGS84 differential GPS locating and digital film and multi spectral geophysical aquisition). No so hard if there's a few relatively unique man made features. | |||||||||||||||||
|