▲ | antonvs 5 days ago | |
I was interested in how this compares in a kind of absolute sense. For comparison, an optimized C hello world program gave these results using `perf` on my Dell XPS 13 laptop:
That's 36,800% faster. Hand-written assembly was very slightly slower. Using the standard library for output instead of a syscall brought it down to 20,900% faster.(Yes I used percentages to underscore how big the difference is. It's 368x and 209x respectively. That's huge.) Begrudgingly, here are the standard Python numbers:
About 1230% faster than the sandbox, i.e. 12.3x. About an order of magnitude, which is typical for these kinds of exercises. | ||
▲ | singularity2001 5 days ago | parent [-] | |
haha, 99% is startup time for the sandbox, but yeah, python via wasm is probably still 10-400 times slower than c. |