> Also it is irrelevant of whether publisher earns 75% or 30% of the total revenue. What matters is how much they are earning compared to the next best alternative.

Not if Google illegally monopolizes the market unfairly hindering 'the next best alternative'.

> Google is not a "monopoly" in this space.

You've made that comment on a post where a judge has ruled "Google is illegally monopolizing"...

> In fact the world has far too many Google equivalents but absolutely no one comes close to Google in generating top dollars for publishers.

They have not been able to compete in a fair market.

This comment has some great examples.. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43719246