▲ | jeffbee 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why though? Cr-Mo steel tubing is already superior to 304 stainless in every relevant measure, except surface corrosion. In particular this article discusses fatigue behavior, and Cr-Mo has a (much) higher fatigue limit than 304. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | seethishat 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is also true WRT knife steels. Old, simple carbon based steels are much stronger than most stainless steels. They tend to bend rather than chip or break (when abused). They do rust and do have less edge retention than some stainless steels (such as S90V), but otherwise they are generally stronger. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | hinkley 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reynolds 501 is CrMo. But 531, which was more coveted, swapped the chrome for manganese, making it lighter at the same mechanical numbers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | stickfigure 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The stainless steel construction helps with flux dispersal when you hit 88mph. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | topspin 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Cr-Mo steel tubing is already superior to 304 stainless in every relevant measure If you exclude cost as a relevant measure. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|