▲ | mplanchard 3 days ago | |||||||
Meta request to authors: please define your acronyms at least once! Even in scientific domains where a high level of background knowledge is expected, it is standard practice to define each acronym prior to its use in the rest of the paper, for example “using three-letter acronyms (TLAs) without first defining them is a hindrance to readability.” | ||||||||
▲ | nathell 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Alessandra Sierra has a great piece on this: | ||||||||
▲ | a1ff00 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Couldn’t agree more. Had a hell of a time looking at how they were using RL after first use, but gave up in frustration when the remainder of the text was more use of undefined symbols/acronyms. | ||||||||
▲ | philipwhiuk 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
On this note - what's "i.i.d."? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[deleted] |