| ▲ | sneak 8 months ago | |||||||
There’s no need for them to move to FTTH; 99.9% of homes don’t need more than 10-20Mbps upstream. I was on 1000/40 for most of my history with them ($100+$50) now I have 2000/100 ($150+$50). I would be fine with 40Mbps upstream unlimited; the issue is not the throttling but the threats resulting from bait-and-switch. | ||||||||
| ▲ | icedchai 8 months ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The problem with cable internet is that the shared medium (coax segment) has relatively little upstream bandwidth, shared by 100's of users. FTTH has much more bandwidth and a smaller amount of homes sharing it. Typically there is a passive splitter / fiber distribution for 8 to 32 homes, at least an order of magnitude better than cable. I switched to fiber a few years back. But at one point during covid, my cable modem upstream was getting less than a megabit (I was paying for 500/30.) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | martinald 8 months ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I disagree - video conferencing and screensharing with a couple of calls at once will quickly eat up 10-20mbit/sec. 50-100mbit/sec I would agree is enough. Regardless you're missing the point. DOCSIS has maybe 100-200mbit/sec of upstream shared between hundreds of homes - this will vary depending on config, and keep in mind a lot of that will be used for TCP ACKs from the downstream. So you probably have say 50-100mbit/sec "real" upstream available, or less than 1mbit/sec per subscriber. If you hammered 40mbit/sec hard you are using nearly the entire 'usable' upstream of your entire cable modem segment. DOCSIS is just massively inferior to FTTH for this reason. | ||||||||