| ▲ | VWWHFSfQ 6 days ago | |||||||
> But why put your brand at the mercy of a government like that? Literally every single TLD is administered by a government. .com itself is under jurisdiction of USA and operated by Verisign | ||||||||
| ▲ | ryan29 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> .com itself is under jurisdiction of USA and operated by Verisign Barely. The NTIA gave up all their leverage over .com in 2018. The only thing the US can do at this point is let the cooperative agreement auto-renew to limit price increases. I wouldn't be surprised if the US withdrew from the agreement altogether at this point. Then .com would fall under the joint control of ICANN and Verisign. | ||||||||
| ▲ | AStonesThrow 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> Literally every single TLD is administered by a government. False. I’m not sure what you’re trying to assert, but governments don’t necessarily need to control/admin gTLDs, and as far as ccTLDs go, they’re under jurisdiction of the corresponding nation, usually, but they’re going to be “administered” by a tech company that holds a contract. Anyway, “.com” does indeed answer to U.S. jurisdiction, despite being technically a gTLD, but registrations are not restricted to US-based entities. The main things that keep “.com” associated with the USA include the history/legacy of this quintessential “original” domain, as well as a general support from major countries that provide a “second-level” commercial domain, such as “.co.uk”. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | johnisgood 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
What about .name? | ||||||||
| ||||||||