▲ | dehrmann 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
It matters. If it's not subsidized, it's not actually free, it's just baked into the price, and a large player like Walmart might be able to compete. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | Shog9 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Which is possibly the bigger deal. Every time I shop at a specialty provider I end up frustrated by their lack of clarity around shipping costs - many will actually force you to go through the entire order process before giving you a shipping estimate, complete with collecting contact information. Makes it very tedious to price-shop. I will actually go out of my way to search for some suppliers on Amazon, eBay, Walmart, even Tictok before dealing with buying directly, just so I can rule them out if they're gonna pull a "$10 + $60 s&h" trick. And... Again, this isn't new; pretty sure Ronco was doing this on TV before the Web. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | Gothmog69 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What I find wild is at least at my walmart they pay the employees to shop for customers for their delivery service. Like how can that be cost effective? Walmart used to be a leader in tech in the 90s now it's applying ancient techniques to modern problems. |