▲ | allisonee 4 days ago | |||||||
sorry to hear that it didn't catch all the issues! if you downvote/upvote or reply directly to the bot comment @mrge-io <feedback>, we can improve it for your team. We take all these into consideration when improving our AI, and your direct reply will fine tune comments for your repository-only. | ||||||||
▲ | eqvinox 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
That's good to know, but —assuming my sample of size 1 isn't a bad outlier, I should really try a few more— there's another problem: I don't think we'd be willing to sink time into tuning a currently-free subscription service that can be yanked at any time. And I'm in a position to say it is highly unlikely that we'd pay for the service. (We already have problems with our human review being too superficial; we've recently come to a consensus that we're letting too much technical debt slip in, in the sense of unnoticed design problems.) Now the funny part is that I'm talking about a FOSS project with nVidia involvement ;D But also: this being a FOSS project, people have opened AI-generated PRs. Poor AI-generated PRs. This is indirectly hurting the prospects of your product (by reputation). Might I suggest adding an AI generated PR detector, if possible? (It's not in our guidelines yet but I expect we'll be prohibiting AI generated contributions soon.) | ||||||||
|