I don't know if I love this more for the sheer usefulness, or for the delightful over-the-top "Proper English Butler" diction.

But what really has my attention is: Why is this something I'm reading about on this smart engineer's blog rather than an Apple or Google product release? The fact that even this small set of features is beyond the abilities of either of those two companies to ship -- even with caveats like "Must also use our walled garden ecosystem for email, calendars, phones, etc" -- is an embarrassment, only obscured by the two companies' shared lack of ambition to apply "AI" technology to the 'solved problem' areas that amount to various kinds of summarization and question-answering.

If ever there was a chance to threaten either half of this lumbering, anticompetitive duopoly, certainly it's related to AI.

There’s actually a good answer to this, namely that narrowly targeting the needs of exactly one family allows you to develop software about 1000x faster. This is an argument in favor of personal software.

This is literally in the first chapter of Mythical Man-Month:

> One occasionally reads newspaper accounts of how two programmers in a remodeled garage have built an important program that surpasses the best efforts of large teams. And every programmer is prepared to believe such tales, for he knows that he could build any program much faster than the 1000 statements/year reported for industrial teams.

> Why then have not all industrial programming teams been replaced by dedicated garage duos? One must look at what is being produced.

One reason might be that personal data going into a database handled by a highly experimental software might be a non-issue for this dev, but it is a serious risk for Google, Apple, etc.

The reason Google and Apple stopped innovating is simply because they make too much money from their current products and see every innovation primarily as a risk to their existing business. This is something that happens all the time to market leaders.

Take a look at Home Assistant - I would argue their implementation is currently better than both Siri & Gemini assistants.

HA team is releasing actually useful updates every month - eg ability for assistant to proactively ask you something.

In my opinion both Google & Apple have huge issues with cooperation between product teams, while cooperation with external companies is next to impossible.

Because how would you monetize this? Because would google or apple make a product that talks to telegram? Or anything with an open ecosystem?

All the big guys are trying to do is suck the eggs out of their geese faster.

As some of the other commenters have directly and indirectly pointed out, I believe this is the crux of the AI Agent problem. Each user has a customized workflow they’re trying to achieve. This doesn’t lend well to a “product” or “SaaS”. It leads to thousands of bespoke implementations.

I’m not sure how you get over this hurdle. My email agent is inevitably different than everyone else’s email agent.

It’s because this story hints at the concept of “Unmetered AI”. It can be easily hosted locally and run with a self-hosted LLM.

Wonder if Edison mentioned Nikola Tesla much in his writings?