| ▲ | pansa2 8 days ago |
| IMO it's much closer to the ideal way to write the function, which would be something like: fn stringify(item) =>
item.is_a(String) then item else
item.value.convert(item.conversion).format(item.format_spec)
fn f(template) => template.map(stringify).join()
|
|
| ▲ | pphysch 8 days ago | parent [-] |
| By what definition of "ideal"? You just hid all the complexity in those undefined `convert` and `format` methods. |
| |
| ▲ | pansa2 8 days ago | parent [-] | | The original code does the same! All the real work is inside `convert` and `format`, it just adds another layer of complexity on top. The ideal version has the same behaviour and shows that the extra complexity is unnecessary. |
|
