▲ | cadamsdotcom 8 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
The article dismisses sleep duration and regularity as weak indicators of quality, and I’d say that’s true - for one night of sleep considered alone. However so many don’t have a sleep routine at all, and can benefit from simple starting measures like gamifying sleep duration and timeliness. Hence the sleep trackers on the market cater to “sleep quality novices”. Once you’re no longer a novice then for sure start tweaking, like the author seeks to do. But so many are just start of the journey and the author - no doubt way further down the road - might’ve forgotten how hard it is to get a good night’s sleep when you block any hope of a routine with alcohol, late nights out, late night coding binges, and early morning starts for run club. It’s horses for courses. Considering how few “advanced” sleep trackers exist for consumers it’s likely hard to get quality data and not a lot of people know they’re ready for the next level. May their product find its niche! | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | pedalpete 8 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This is a good point, I am the author. You're right that many people would benefit from a regular schedule, and I wrote a blog post a few weeks ago which talked about why it's important to focus on wake time instead of bed time - which is the common advice. We're really trying to focus on changing the story of sleep. You say most people don't have a consistent bedtime, but people are creatures of habit, so you'd probably be surprised how many people have good hygiene but still don't feel their sleep is restorative enough. Thanks for the comment on finding our niche specifically. We're not aiming to be for everyone (yet). | |||||||||||||||||
|