| ▲ | XCSme 11 days ago |
| How does it compare to https://www.chartjs.org/ ? |
|
| ▲ | go_prodev 11 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's much heavier but a lot more powerful and flexible. |
| |
| ▲ | XCSme 11 days ago | parent [-] | | Thanks! And is it more or less performant on large datasets (100k+ data points). | | |
| ▲ | etimberg 11 days ago | parent [-] | | maintainer of chartjs here. It’s probably more performant. Chart.js isn’t designed for a ton of data and we recommend sampling before visualization . We have a builtin plugin that does a form of min/max sampling to retain peaks but cut down on the amount of data points drawn | | |
| ▲ | rudasn 11 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Hey! Thanks for maintaining chartjs :) | |
| ▲ | leeoniya 10 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | maintainer of uPlot here :) they're about same for line chart rendering when using decimation in both. | |
| ▲ | XCSme 10 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Wow, that's cool, thanks for working on it, I've been using Chart.js for many years :) Performance seemed quite good with Chart.js in my case, for small to medium datasets. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | joshkel 10 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The biggest difference I'm aware of is that ECharts has an add-on for 3D charts (echarts-gl). Chart.js doesn't have any 3D functionality. (Our project mostly uses Chart.js, so I'm more familiar with it.) |
