▲ | dllu 11 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fujifilm lossy compressed raw still isn't supported after many years [1]. [1] https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed/issues/366 And in my experience there has been lots of bugs with Fujifilm raws in darktable: [2] https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed/issues/354 [3] https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/18073 However, Fujifilm lossless compressed raw actually does a decent job keeping the file sizes down (about 50% to 60% the file size of uncompressed) while maintaining decent write speed during burst shooting. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | zahlman 11 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's really strange to me that a lossy compressed format could be called "raw". Does that just mean that it hasn't been e.g. gamma-corrected before the compression was applied? (Is it even a good idea to do lossy compression before such correction?) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|