| ▲ | andruby 3 days ago |
| That's a rather binary view and I disagree that rules always fall in either category. Knowing _why_ a rule exists and what it's trying to prevent/achieve is much more valuable in my opinion. Wether or not to follow or bend a rule depends so much on the context. |
|
| ▲ | martinsnow 3 days ago | parent [-] |
| Your argument circles back to the posters point. Knowing which rule you can break at a specific point in time. Why are you being so anal about it? |
| |
| ▲ | zamadatix 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I think it's a worthwhile addition to highlight there is 3) rules which are sometimes red tape and sometimes to be broken, on top of the other 2 categories. It adds on to the original point with the addition of how to universally discover what the categories are rather than prescribe them up front. | | |
| ▲ | throwup238 2 days ago | parent [-] | | To add to that, #3 is often explicitly encoded into the red tape as an escape hatch for foreseeable exceptional circumstances like disaster recovery and big client emergencies. |
|
|
