| ▲ | enopod_ 11 hours ago |
| Looks to me like OpenAI drew their guardrails somewhere along a financial line. Generate a Micky Mouse or a Pikachu? Disney and Pokemon will sue the sh*t out of you. Ghibli? Probably not powerful enough to risk a multimillion years long court battle. |
|
| ▲ | gcmrtc 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Strong with the weak, weak with the strong. |
| |
|
| ▲ | nticompass 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I thought Disney had the rights to publish Ghibli movies in the US. |
| |
| ▲ | davidhaymond 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | They did, but the rights expired. GKIDS now has the theatrical and home video rights to Studio Ghibli films in the US (except for Grave of the Fireflies). |
|
|
| ▲ | bufferoverflow 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Mickey Mouse (the original one) is out of copyright, as of last year, AFAIR. |
|
| ▲ | briandear 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Ghibli isn’t a character, but a style. You can’t copyright it. |
| |
| ▲ | sejje 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes, the only test will eventually be "Can you train AI on copyrighted works" | | |
| ▲ | contravariant 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I consider this article quite strong proof that generative AI is closer to copying than it is to creating a new derivative work. |
| |
| ▲ | briandear 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | For the downvotes: https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf “Copyright does not protect
• Ideas, procedures, methods, systems, processes, concepts, principles, or discoveries” Not sure why this is even controversial, this has been the case for a hundred years. |
|
