| ▲ | kelnos 14 days ago | |
> slandering them Is anything in the article factually incorrect? If not, then it's not slander. (Well, not libel. Slander involves speech, while libel is for words.) It seems these websites did exist, and he admitted to doing all this destructive, anti-social hacking as a teenager. These seem to be facts. Sure, the article is taking a moral stance on that, but most do. And I happen to agree with them that someone like this guy should be nowhere near sensitive governments systems, especially part of a task force of people who are dismantling democracy in the US. | ||
| ▲ | rbanffy 14 days ago | parent [-] | |
> These seem to be facts. Actions the person in question freely admitted having done. | ||