If logical points are all against sth that is debatable then it's a rant. They can be good points tho.

• Instead of forming hypotheses, users asked the AI for ideas.

• Instead of validating sources, they assumed the AI had already done so.

• Instead of assessing multiple perspectives, they integrated and edited the AI’s summary and moved on.

These are point against certain actions with a tool not against the tool.

AI is for the starting point not the final result.

AI must never be the last step but it often is because people trust computers especially if they answer in a confident language.

It's the ELIZA effect all over again.