| ▲ | fnordpiglet 8 months ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Very few supplier industries run with a 54% margin such that the supplier can eat that and stay in business, so less orders is better than more orders that lose money on each order. For many products the margins even at the end are in the single to low double digits. This means costs go to consumers, which practically translates to inflation and decreased spending, which leads to stagnation etc. The analysis that this will stifle game makers is pretty likely true, and I see no future where the economics of that moves supply chains state side in our life time. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ViktorRay 8 months ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
People always talk about companies having low profit margins. Whenever any tax or expense falls on these companies, folks point to the low profit margins and say the expenses will go to the customer. And yet these low profit margin corporations have executives and CEOs making millions of dollars a year. It doesn’t make any sense. Why not just pay the executives and finance people less? (My comment does not apply to the small business board game company the original op thread link was about. My comment is only a direct reply to what this other comment is saying) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||