What makes you think this was created by an LLM?

I suspect they might actually have a pool named faster -- I know I've named pools similarly in the past. This is why I now name my pools after characters from the Matrix, as is tradition.

This really gets to an acceleration of enshittification. If you can't tell its an LLM, and there's nobody to verify the information, humanity is architecting errors and mindfucks into everything. All of the markers of what is trustworthy has been coopted by untrustworthy machines, so all of the way's we'd previously differentiated actors have stopped working. It feels like we're just losing truth as rapidly as LLMs can generate mistakes. We've built a scoundrels paradise.

How useful is a library of knowledge when n% of the information is suspect? We're all about to find out.

The pool is named backups according to zpool status and the paragraph right after.

But then again the old id doesn't match between the two commands.