▲ | nonrandomstring a day ago | |||||||
> This isn’t a rant against AI. I use it daily It is, but it adds disingenuous apologetic. Not wishing to pick on this particular author, or even this particular topic, but it follows a clear pattern that you can find everywhere in tech journalism:
Practically every article on the negative effects of smartphones or
social media printed in the past 20 years starts with the same chirpy
disavowal of the authors actual message. Something like;"Smartphones and social media are an essential part of modern life today... but" That always sounds like those people who say "I'm not a racist, but..." Sure, we get it, there's a lot of money and powerful people riding on "AI". Why water down your message of genuine concern? | ||||||||
▲ | rini17 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
There were too many cheap accusations of hypocrisy "you say X is bad so why do you use it yourself". So everyone is now preempting it. | ||||||||
▲ | trinsic2 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think this is a good point regardless of how much you have been down voted. I hope your not using this context to sub-communicate this issue isn't important. If not, It might have been better to put your last line at the top | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | Aeolun a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> It is, but it adds disingenuous apologetic. It’s not. It’s a rant against people and their laziness and gullibility. |