▲ | recursive a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
Provide a way to get a lower-cost credential without using the tuition to subsidize research/athletics/arts/social programs. But that might be counter to their whole nature. Doesn't mean anyone's being irrational though. They're now de-facto gatekeepers on entering the professional class. I don't think it's unreasonable for the gate-kept to have opinions about the -keepers. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | treis a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I've got the ticket to get in the gate and I'm pretty resentful of having to get it. Looking back there were a lot better ways to spend 4 years and 100k. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | xracy 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Honestly, it feels like the kind of thing that companies which actually want merit-based graduates should want to subsidize more aggressively. If you're a billion-dollar company that only hires college grads, it feels like there's gotta be value to you in making sure there's more meritocracy in the process of getting degrees. It would also change who the customer is so that the university doesn't "owe" the student a degree which makes the evaluation that universities do a little less rigorous. | |||||||||||||||||
|