| ▲ | travisjungroth a day ago | |
I just made up this scenario and these words, so I'm sure it wasn't in the training data. Kwomps can zark but they can't plimf. Ghirns are a lot like Kwomps, but better zarkers. Plyzers have the skills the Ghirns lack. Quoning, a type of plimfing, was developed in 3985. Zhuning was developed 100 years earlier. I have an erork that needs to be plimfed. Choose one group and one method to do it. > Use Plyzers and do a Quoning procedure on your erork. If that doesn't count as reasoning or generalization, I don't know what does. https://chatgpt.com/share/67eee8dd-43a4-8004-afde-2fe3fc9630... | ||
| ▲ | voidspark a day ago | parent [-] | |
LOL. I tried this with Grok https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_1e6f3801-c9fb-4d33-844b-3902... "Based on the information you provided, it seems you need something capable of plimfing to handle your erork. Kwomps can’t plimf, so they’re out. Ghirns are similar to Kwomps and excel at zarking, but there’s no indication they can plimf either. Plyzers, however, have the skills that Ghirns lack, and since plimfing is a skill Ghirns don’t have, it’s reasonable to infer Plyzers can plimf. As for the method, quoning is explicitly described as a type of plimfing, while zhuning isn’t mentioned as such—only that it was developed earlier. So, I’d choose the Plyzers to plimf your erork using quoning. They seem capable, and quoning fits the job." | ||