That's not at all on par with what I'm saying.

There exists a generally accepted baseline definition for what crosses the threshold of intelligent behavior. We shouldn't seek to muddy this.

EDIT: Generally its accepted that a core trait of intelligence is an agent’s ability to achieve goals in a wide range of environments. This means you must be able to generalize, which in turn allows intelligent beings to react to new environments and contexts without previous experience or input.

Nothing I'm aware of on the market can do this. LLMs are great at statistically inferring things, but they can't generalize which means they lack reasoning. They also lack the ability to seek new information without prompting.

The fact that all LLMs boil down to (relatively) simple mathematics should be enough to prove the point as well. It lacks spontaneous reasoning, which is why the ability to generalize is key