Remix clone Hacker News

They objectively do not have all the money, or even a particularly significant share of the money, so you're starting off with a falsehood.

In a communist economy, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk still exist. The difference is that instead of getting their money/power from providing value to people by selling things, they got it from political connections and corruption. They would also have a larger share of the pie, and living conditions would be significantly worse for everyone in the classes below them. This is easy to see if you have any knowledge of present and prior communist regimes.

▲

freejazz 18 hours ago | parent [-]

I think it's rather humorous to say they don't have "even a particularly significant share of the money" about the two richest people in the world.

I think you'd have a point if what they had wasn't a "particularly significant share of the money" more than others. Like... being the richest person in a subway car isn't that impressive. It's not that much more. Being the richest person at Cipriani's in midtown during lunch... now we're talking. But the two richest people in the world don't have "a particularly significant share of the money"?

What planet do you live on?

	▲	throw10920 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Elon Musk is worth 378 billion, and Jeff Bezos is worth 196 billion, for a combined 574 billion. The combined net worth of those two is less than 4% of the 16.1 trillion of combined net worth of all ~3k billionaires in the world, which is total assets, which far exceeds the actual amount of cash that they hold. Furthermore, all of the wealth of those billionaires is a fraction of the total wealth of the world. > What planet do you live on? You need to calm down and start learning to think rationally instead of believing that your emotions correspond to reality. As a reminder, you falsely claimed that Jeff and Elon had "all the money" and have been going on ignorant, emotional, and irrational rants about them.