▲ | yoyoyoyop 2 days ago | |||||||
Can you explain why they have 3 concurrent cursor projects for the same code base? | ||||||||
▲ | alexjplant 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Presumably to crank out multiple features at the same time. After spending some time writing project rules for Cursor I've gotten it to reliably implement end-to-end CRUD operations from a simple description of the fields and functionality. It's pretty neat and surprisingly accurate but it does take time to generate on the order of ~1k LOC so I understand the desire for parallelization. If you have a well-factored codebase with loose coupling, good abstractions, etc. this should be pretty doable without them stepping on each other. | ||||||||
▲ | trashchomper 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I assume they're trying to work on three features at the same time | ||||||||
|