▲ | 3abiton 10 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This looks interesting! What's the added value over wireguard + openwrt setup? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | watusername 10 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Your devices will connect to each other peer-to-peer (even behind complex NATs) with no manual configuration, subject to ACLs you centrally manage. It just works. People sometimes dismiss Tailscale as "just" a WireGuard orchestrator, but it's actually much more than that - From a product perspective, WireGuard is just an implementation detail. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | usagisushi 10 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It's a mesh VPN, so peers communicate directly without additional delay. I opted for Netbird myself because Headscale's UI felt too basic for me back then. Has that improved over the years probably? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | alabastervlog 9 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tailscale's value prop is "Wireguard that the merely somewhat-technically-inclined can set up and manage unassisted". Across tons and tons of clients (my AppleTVs connect to my Tailscale network, this took maybe a minute to configure—and they can act as gateways) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | sunshine-o 9 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Some do not want/have a fixed IP address or anything listening on their home network. Tailscale or having Headscale hosted somewhere else allows you to do that. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | 10 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[deleted] |