Remix clone Hacker News

That's not my point of view at all, and I have little issue with what happened and have no concern about Mozilla and privacy.

The endless repetition of these comments is becoming spammy - they have nothing to say but the exact same thing again. We get it; you don't need to repeat it. It's like someone writing, at every opportunity, 'I don't trust Meta' and adding nothing more.

▲

olyjohn 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I probably say this too much too, but it feels like just a justification to keep using shiny Chrome. Even though the recent ToS fiasco basically had the same language as Chrome's ToS, and wasn't really as bad as everybody freaked out about. People still just find whatever excuse.

Like fine if you like Chrome, just admit you love Chrome because it's shiny.

	▲	glenstein 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Exactly. I just feel like a point that originally was reasonable (around 2016 or so) became the spiraling echo chamber that became increasingly nonsensical and increasingly divorced from rhyme, reason, causation, logic, or proportionality. Case in point, Google Chrome has pushed web standards to consolidate its control over the web, but Firefox hid a cheeky reference to a TV show in its code one time! Those are incredibly different scales of offense.
	▲	qu4z-2 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You don't understand why someone who uses Firefox specifically because of its stance on privacy would be upset that the ToS are being updated to be "basically [the] same language as Chrome's"? Chrome, as in Google, the biggest name in tracking and ad-tech? I haven't used Chrome since whenever they started logging you into the browser when you logged into GMail, and I'm sure most complaints about negative changes in Firefox come from long-standing Firefox users.

▲

roelschroeven a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But I do care about privacy, and other people do too. And I can read between the lines, and never take PR for fact. What remains is that Mozilla is looking for new cash, and sees selling user data as a solution for that. They want to call it differently, they want us to think it's all OK, but it's not. It's still better than other browsers though.

	▲	mmooss a day ago \| parent [-]
		If only writing it as fact made it fact, you'd have an argument.

▲

willywanker 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

>I have little issue with what happened and have no concern about Mozilla and privacy.

Others clearly do, so your dismissing also ironically adds nothing like the comments you referred to. Those who continue to ignore Mozilla's enshittification over the years are part of the problem; as are normies who fall for their marketing about privacy. Spreading awareness about this is important, whether here or other online fora.

	▲	mmooss a day ago \| parent [-]
		> Spreading awareness It's not spreading awareness, it's just spam at this point. > is important How is it important to take down Mozilla? How is it valuable - maybe do something constructive if you are concerned. Even if you don't like them, aren't there many far more important things to do? Can you think of bigger problems?