| |
| ▲ | dooglius 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I have `showdead` enabled. It should not be the case that I find flagged posts that are good -- that are well written, don't break rules, etc -- but are flagged (presumably) due to expressing a dissenting view. | | |
| ▲ | pvg 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That ‘presumably’ is doing a lot of lifting and would be better supported by some examples of such posts. | | |
| ▲ | dooglius 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That's fair from your perspective -- although the parent's question is what would subjectively satisfy me. I don't keep a log of such instances, and I don't see a way to view my vouched posts, but it is something I observe often enough. | | |
| ▲ | pvg 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Sure, but the reason that question is being raised is so that we can decide for ourselves how good your evidence is - both conceptually and concretely. It certainly doesn't mean you have to share it but it makes the discussion actually meaningful. Your vouched items should be visible to you at https://news.ycombinator.com/vouched?id=dooglius | | |
| ▲ | mh- 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Does that link only show vouched items of some recency? The page is literally blank (minus header and footer) for me, but it's probably been a week or so since I vouched a comment. edit: sorry, I missed the sibling comment to this. I only ever come across dead comments, not posts. So I needed to add &kind=comment to see vouched comments. | |
| ▲ | dooglius 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah, I meant comments rather than posts (and I think flagging posts has a different meaning since one cannot downvote posts) but it looks like comments are visible by adding `&kind=comment`. Anyway, the most recent comment I vouched is https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43530295 which I think is a good example of what I'm talking about. |
|
| |
| ▲ | MrMcCall 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | otterley 2 days ago | parent [-] | | The person you’re responding to is not Paul Graham. Similar handle but not identical. > The people here are rather anti-compassion and any kind of spirituality.
And how I was attacked for calling David Lynch a worthless purveyor of ultraviolence and vapid, wasteful lifestyles was unconscionable. Maybe your problem is not with your opinions but with how you choose to express them. My observation is that disagreement is rarely downvoted massively if it is expressed eloquently. OTOH, emotional and brief conclusory opinions that aren’t supported with narratives or supporting information that are also contrarian may be subject to mass downvoting. Looking through your comment history, I think you’re experiencing this phenomenon not because you respectfully disagree with others, but because of the quality of your communication. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | gus_massa 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can vouch it, and if the comment is still [dead] but it's really good you can send an email to dang and tomhow hn@ycombinator.com Remember to include a link to the comment, and use it sparsely because it's a manual processes. | | |
| ▲ | mh- 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Like the parent commenter, I frequently see high quality posts via showdead. I vouch them, but I've never seen one resurrected soon after. I rarely remember to go back and check hours later, but by then the thread has died down anyway. | | |
| ▲ | gus_massa a day ago | parent [-] | | It takes a few vouches to unkill a comment. (The exact number is a mystery (I don't remember dang telling the number ever) and it may change from time to time (or not).) For not-bad comments just vouch them, but for very-good-I-will-not-be-able-to-sleep-until-it-is-unkilled comments vouch and send an email. |
|
|
|
|
