Remix clone Hacker News

Wait, you can publish anonymously as long as the government approves of your speech and doesn't hinder you?

Then they throw bogus charges on you because "the process is the punishment" and to discourage other people saying things they don't like. Prior restraint is what some would call that.

▲

theGeatZhopa 2 days ago | parent [-]

you've read, that:

a. there are easy possibilities to poison the printed tracking code

b. the location of the printer is not trackable by default (but for sure can be added through drivers. But then, tracking will be the smallest problem)

c. there are laws what can be said and what not. Also, what is legal, free speech & thought, or, what is art, is defined. Other than that might give you problems. And it should. No one is above the law in a proper democracy, except your name is Trump of course.

so, you can print what you want. But if its illegal, than I'm glad you get the punishment. But, for being able to punish you, the executive needs your location and know it's been you. How can they find out it was you, other then with "caught in the act"? If they have enough hints who you are and for being able to locate you, then the tracking code is just an evidence that you produced it.

What if you use your neighbor's printer? What if you use the poisoning technique? Knowledge is all, when being a criminal. Others are not touched by that, and if, poisoning, old disposable printers or usage of neighbor's devices and the classical reproduction methods aka printing (industrial) are still tools, one can use. I don't understand the alarmism.

▲

sneak 2 days ago | parent [-]

Simply being prosecuted maliciously without evidence is enough to ruin one’s life. It’s not a matter of illegal or legal.

With the ability to identify perceived enemies of an administration, this weapon can be leveraged against anyone saying entirely legal things that the administration doesn’t like.

It’s not alarmism, it’s simply realpolitik.

▲

theGeatZhopa 2 days ago | parent [-]

its alarmism.

prosecution without evidence -> what does it have to do with tracking code?

How does the government know, the one've written what they dislike is you, in case they find a peace on the street and read the tracking code? Its an evidence, but, they dont know who printed it, where the printer is, and, hence, its absolutely not a imminent problem.

It will be a problem, though, if you register your device (serialnumber + name/address). But then, the printer-producer is the last firewall - and - its darwin' law then.

If one wants to criticize, distribute illegal writings and whatever else, then one should be literate in what one does and use caution. In a democracy, there are rules for all to adhere to. In areas without rules, one is literate enough to know how to keep safe or just not criticizing anyway.

btw, in europe its not realpolitik. In U.S. it wasn't until Trump - but, the populous have voted!

Of which countries are you talking, where such is realpolitik?

▲

fsflover a day ago | parent [-]

> How does the government know, the one've written what they dislike is you, in case they find a peace on the street and read the tracking code?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43557589

	▲	theGeatZhopa a day ago \| parent [-]
		thats HP and no one should buy HPs printers anymore until they stop their doings. Their aggressive behavior towards the customer and lurkin' into paying monthly subscription, data & update politics, mandatory always-on-internet-connection... Thats on top. So, as an informed individual being, one should avoid HP. The other printer producers do not insinst on registration or wifi-before-first-use politics. But, who knows. .. again, how can the government find out who you are by having just a code? If there's no mandatory registration (f.e. not HP)? If one knows how to poisen the tracking code? If one use a new/used printer and dispose afterwards? If one use the "neighbor from the first floor" printer? There is no possibility to find out who printed that, if one takes a little bit caution and have little bit of knowledge. Even print-out-once-copy-many would make the code unreadable (f.e. normal quality and/or black & white) ... spread the word! W00t W00t! :)