▲ | westurner 2 days ago | |||||||
What about muon imaging? What about Rydberg sensors for VLF earth penetrating imaging, at least? From "3D scene reconstruction in adverse weather conditions via Gaussian splatting" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42900053 : > Is it possible to see microwave ovens on the ground with a Rydberg antenna array for in-cockpit drone Remote ID signal location? With a frequency range from below 1 KHz to multiple THz fwiu, Rydberg antennae can receive VLF but IDK about ELF. IIRC there's actually also a way to transmit with or like Rydberg antennae now; probably with VLF if that's best for the application and there's not already enough backscatter to e.g. infer occlusion with? https://www.google.com/search?q=transmit+with+Rydberg+antenn.... | ||||||||
▲ | nizarmah 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
This is pretty cool! I need to learn more about both. I imagine such fancier tools would be less available among common folks, and more among first responders. NASA already has the tech to detect heartbeats under rubble using radar [1]. No additional equipment is needed by the rescued. The problem is emergency response can get overwhelmed in large disasters. If Rydberg sensors would be more common, and new tech is added to mobile devices, this can seriously shift the playing field. I will look into this, because we need out of the box solutions. Thank you! [1]: https://www.dhs.gov/archive/detecting-heartbeats-rubble-dhs-... | ||||||||
|