Remix clone Hacker News

>It's a really fascinating perspective on WWII and how crap Monty was at being a general; he was reading the Germans' messages and still couldn't defeat Rommel.

He did defeat Rommel though, didn't he?

▲

hermitcrab 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

And he defeated him twice. In the desert in 1942 and in France in 1944. Not bad for a crap General.

	▲	MrMcCall 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Eisenhower defeated Rommel, my friend, with Patton's brilliant help, dragging a limping Monty along by the hair. He was nearly sacked for insubordination. The Germans only feared one Allied General, and it wasn't Monty (it was Patton). If fact, Patton being relieved of command for slapping his soldier allowed him to serve as the uber-decoy in Great Britain to distract the Germans from being ready for a Normandy landing. God works in mysterious ways, indeed. The Germans thought Patton's sacking for slapping a soldier was a ruse; that's how much esteem they had for him.

▲

MrMcCall 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"They" defeated Rommel. No one can say whether he would have done so without Bletchley. Personally, I doubt he would have done so without the Med fleet utterly destroying all of Rommel's resupply train, but that's just my opinion.

▲

jimnotgym 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, by rather a masterstroke of deliberately extending Rommels supply lines and fighting a giant staged battle at Rommels limit. By doing so he destroyed or captured much of Rommels men and material, rather than just pushing him back. All of which he did after a string of other Generals failed on the same front.