No. At least not in the way this term is defined - which seems to just take whatever the LLM spits out and push / check-in the code.

I use LLMs otherwise and careful to test (if it is code), validate and generally not take things they say for granted.

I picture ‘vibe coding’ as coding under the influence or not following proper engineering principles. No one is talking about ‘vibe building’ bridges or buildings - yet anyway - and I hope we don’t get there.