▲ | ghaff a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There's even more overhead on the people being provisionally hired. Yes, sometimes things just don't work out. But, if someone quits a job and maybe relocates, that's a big personal cost. It's just the way things work in some limited contexts (e.g. professional sports) but it's not and shouldn't be the norm. I suppose you can give a huge sign-on bonus with no claw-back provision, but that's never going to happen in most cases. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | codr7 a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm fully convinced the way to make better hires is to invest more, which will be more expensive. Which wouldn't be a problem unless we expected something else. It starts with quitting pretending the current process is working, or even close to optimal. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|