While I agree that the author is just whining about this situation and that AWS did nothing wrong, I'd argue that a change in defaults is a breaking change.

▲

dijksterhuis 5 months ago | parent [-]

https://xkcd.com/1172/

▲

0x457 5 months ago | parent [-]

I don't think that's the case? AWS didn't fix a bug or removed some UB.

That's closer changing default key-binding. Anyways, all I'm saying - I would have considered it a breaking change because it changes default behavior.

▲

dijksterhuis 4 months ago | parent [-]

i treat defaults as a convenience feature which are subject to change :shrug:

	▲	0x457 4 months ago \| parent [-]
		Correct, I just would appreaciate that change in default behavior would be treated as a breaking change. It's really no that hard to grasp and many OSS projects treat it as such.