| ▲ | amazingamazing 2 days ago |
| I wish more services would become de-facto standards and there were many implementations of the same API. I'd love more (cheaper) DynamoDB compatible APIs. |
|
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | gcbirzan a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Why would anyone want a DynamoDB compatible API? |
| |
| ▲ | amazingamazing a day ago | parent [-] | | Dynamodb is great. A ton of services, including this site could literally be implemented with dynamodb alone. | | |
| ▲ | icedchai a day ago | parent [-] | | As always, "it depends", but I'd argue DynamoDB has too many constraints and weird limitations: indexes, query language, item (row) sizes. Unless you really know what you're doing I would not suggest it. You'll likely paint yourself into a corner. | | |
| ▲ | amazingamazing a day ago | parent [-] | | In practice most of the constraints are pretty sensible though. You just need to think a bit about your query patterns. It’s certainly not for all use cases, though. |
|
|
|
