Remix.run Logo
tokioyoyo 2 days ago

You just send out a generic decline, and document it as there's a better candidate fit for the role.

I'm not sure if you guys have been in charge of hiring, but there's no real alternative. In my most recent experience, we had one open position, and after interviewing 10 candidates, 3 of them were basically identical in terms of technical qualifications. How do you choose one over the other, other than the "vibes"? Anyone suggesting otherwise is either living in a weird alternate reality, or doesn't want to accept that working is a cooperative job and interpersonal relationships are very important.

There always will be exceptions for different type of roles and specializations, but that's not what I'm talking about.

tonymet 2 days ago | parent [-]

a large company doing this (no documentation of a skills gap) who gets subpoenaed would lose 10/10 times

tokioyoyo a day ago | parent [-]

I'm curious, what are the recent cases that were brought up where the company lost?

tonymet a day ago | parent [-]

Meta had one around 2020 with EEOC. The Harvard Case I mentioned above (supreme court) , Activision, Dell, a few others on the top of my mind.

tokioyoyo 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I just looked them up, as I recalled those cases differently, and it doesn’t look like anything has to do with declining an applicant due to them not being the right fit for the team.