| ▲ | ncr100 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. The current GOP administration, starting from before this election: - supported funding Project 2025's development by GOP members - talked about Project 2025 favorably - saw Project 2025 demonized by the media - THEN denied they support Project 2025 - got elected using Project 2025 tactics - hired Project 2025 author INTO this new administration - are currently implementing Project 2025 policies. SO "THEY ARE ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT 2025" seems closer to "true" and "fact" than unlikely. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | theultdev 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please find me a clip where Trump supported Project 2025, I'll wait. In every instance, he has said he is not affiliated with it and doesn't support it as a whole. Now there are some agendas in Project 2025 that are fine, some that are pretty out there. So yeah there will be overlap in policies. Just wanted to point out you were wrong about their strategy. There's a name for it it's called "Flood the zone" and it's older than Project 2025. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||