▲ | michaelt 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If they'd gone bankrupt, the employees had all lost their jobs, the shareholders got wiped out, the CEO's stock options were worthless, and burly men were carting the office's aeron chairs to the auction house - that would be a different matter. Wiping out customers' purchases when you've got $100 billion in the bank, though? Kinda a dick move. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | malfist 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ha! The thought of Amazon splurging for aeron chairs for it's workforce made me chuckle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | dylan604 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Wiping out customers' purchases when you've got $100 billion in the bank, though? Kinda a dick move. What you call a dick move might actually have made sense financially for a business. If MS Music was losing money with no hopes of ever turning a profit, why should they continue to operate a charity music service subsidized by all of the other MS businesses that are making money? Same thing for Amazon. If it is something that shows no signs of paying for itself, why continue to operate it? You have to stop the bleeding at some point. What was the attraction to a dev to use Amazon over Google? Lower percentage of the take? Maybe that explains why it was a money loser? At the end of the day, it was a bet on a losing horse. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|