Remix.run Logo
endemic 5 months ago

I think the argument is that for a good chunk of business work, you don't need to use the "interesting"/"deep" concepts. Sure, you'll need time to adapt to the idioms of the language you're using, but following examples you can be just as productive as others in a relatively short time.

Shorel 5 months ago | parent | next [-]

> I think the argument is that for a good chunk of business work, you don't need to use the "interesting"/"deep" concepts.

That's what the MBA people want to believe. To lower costs, or if they see writing code as an operating expense, instead of R&D.

If this is true or not, it depends on many, many factors, and it can change over the course of the business life.

aleph_minus_one 5 months ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> but following examples you can be just as productive as others in a relatively short time.

This is not something nice to say about the colleagues. :-)

rmah 5 months ago | parent | prev [-]

But companies don't pay high salaries for the 80% mundane and easy tasks you do day to day. They pay for the 20% that is challenging and especially for that 1% of problems that occur only once every few months or years. If that 80% was 100% of the job then the company could pay 1/2 to 1/3rd the amount by outsourcing it.

edmundsauto 4 months ago | parent [-]

I disagree, companies pay based on the problems you can solve to make them money or help achieve organizational goals. One of those ways can be coding, but there are many others.

rmah 4 months ago | parent [-]

I don't really see how that's a disagreement.