▲ | taylodl 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our corporate lawyers say otherwise. The laws applying to data at rest is determined by the jurisdiction where the data is physically stored. That's why we couldn't use GCP for years. Google would never guarantee your data would only be stored in the continental US (mandated by our legal department). Now they can do that, so we use GCP. At an organization I was at previously they had the same legal requirement and so they went all-in on AWS. Google is unlikely to get any of their business anytime in the foreseeable future. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | jeffbee 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
That sounds to me like the epitome of foolishness. Making a law about where your data rests requires a severe misconception of the risks of that data being revealed to your adversaries. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|